Assailants in latest ship attack near Yemen were likely Somali, not Houthi rebels, Pentagon says

2025-01-13 16:25:11 source:lotradecoin withdrawalspeed category:Markets

WASHINGTON (AP) — The five armed assailants captured by U.S. forces after seizing a commercial ship near Yemen over the weekend were likely Somali and not Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, the Pentagon said Monday.

Recent attacks on commercial vessels have been conducted by Houthis, seen as part of a rise in violence in the region due to the Israel-Hamas war.

While the Pentagon was still assessing the motives of the latest group, “we know they are not Houthi,” Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder told reporters. He didn’t rule out that the rebels were somehow linked to the attack.

While piracy in the region is down, this “was clearly a piracy-related event,” Ryder said.

Other news Ukraine and the Western Balkans top Blinken’s agenda for NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels Qatar is the go-to mediator in the Mideast war. Its unprecedented Tel Aviv trip saved a shaky truce Live updates | Israel-Hamas truce will be extended for 2 more days, Qatar says

Yemen’s internationally recognized government in Aden had accused the Houthis of attacking the MV Central Park in the Gulf of Aden on Sunday.

The Liberian-flagged tanker, managed by Zodiac Maritime, sent out a distress call and forces from the USS Mason, an American destroyer, responded.

The five assailants attempted to flee in their small boats, but the U.S. forces pursued them and fired warning shots, “resulting in their eventual surrender,” Ryder said. They were being held aboard the Mason, he said.

However, a little over 90 minutes later, two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi-controlled Yemen landed about 10 nautical miles (18 nautical kilometers) from the Mason. The U.S. destroyer did not engage or try to intercept the missiles because they were not deemed a threat and splashed into the water, Ryder said.

He said it was still not clear whether the ballistic missiles were aiming for the Mason.

Ryder said there were three Chinese vessels in the area at the time but they did not respond to the Central Park’s distress call. The Chinese government has not acknowledged whether it had ships in the area at the time of the attack. According to international maritime law, any ship in the vicinity is required to respond to a distress call.

More:Markets

Recommend

California judges say they’re underpaid, and their new lawsuit could cost taxpayers millions

California judges make a good living. They earn at least $240,000 and can count on a raise just abou

Abercrombie & Fitch’s Activewear Sale Is Fire with 30% off Everything, Plus an Extra 20% off

We independently selected these deals and products because we love them, and we think you might like

Ohio woman who suffered miscarriage at home won't be charged with corpse abuse

An Ohio woman who faced a criminal charge after she suffered a miscarriage at home will not be indic